Maldonado-Mejia v. Williams et al
Juan Carlos Maldonado-Mejia |
Catherine Cortez-Masto and Brian E. Williams, Sr. |
2:2014cv01484 |
September 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER denying 9 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. A certificate of appealability shall not issue and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 33 ORDER Granting 32 Second Unopposed Motion to Extend Time Re: 9 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due 3/25/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 31 ORDER Granting Respondents' 30 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time Re: 9 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due 2/21/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 29 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Respondents' 17 Motion to Dismiss 9 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall file an answer to the remaining claims of the Amended Petition within 45 days of the date of entry of this Order. Maldonado-Mejia shall file a Reply within 30 days of the date of service of the Answer. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 26 ORDER that petitioner shall file any response to the motion to dismiss by October 19, 2018. Given the lengthy period of time the motion to dismiss has been pending, I will not grant any extensions of time to oppose absent an extraordinary showing of good cause. Should petitioner choose not to file a timely opposition to the motion to dismiss, the matter will stand submitted. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 24 ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Extend Time Re: 17 Motion to Dismiss. Respondents' Replies due by 5/4/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 13 ORDER Granting Respondents' 12 Motion for Amended Briefing Schedule. Petitioner shall file all exhibits to the 9 Amended Petition within 30 days of the entry of this Order (see Order for additional deadlines). Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 7 ORDER that 2 Motion for a Stay is GRANTED. This action is STAYED pending resolution of petitioner's post-conviction habeas petition (Eighth District Case No. 09C259004) and any appeal therefrom. FURTHER ORDERED that the grant of a stay is co nditioned upon petitioner returning to federal court with a motion to reopen the case within 45 days of the issuance of the entry and notice of the state district court's order, or if an appeal is taken, the remittitur by the Supreme Court of Ne vada, at the conclusion of the state court proceedings on the post-conviction habeas petition, whichever is later. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk SHALL ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action, until such time as the Court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.