Hunter v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: |
Christopher S. Hunter |
Defendant: |
Clark County Detention Center, Gillispie, Tierra Jones, Lepora, McArthur, Napha Healthcare, Rochelle Nguyen and Megan Thomson |
Case Number: |
2:2014cv01560 |
Filed: |
September 23, 2014 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Las Vegas Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Cam Ferenbach |
Presiding Judge: |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 23, 2018 |
Filing
74
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED 69 defendant Naphcare, Inc.'s motion to dismiss and 71 defendant Darren McArthur's joinder are GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendants Naphcare, Inc. and Darren McArthur and against plaintiff Christopher Hunter. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
March 27, 2018 |
Filing
65
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 62 the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record for Christopher Hunter is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Yampolsky must mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff Hunter and lodge Plaintiff's last know n contact information with the court by 4/3/2018.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Hunter must either retain counsel or file a notice of appearing pro se on or before 5/4/2018.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Hunter must file with the Court written notification of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
November 17, 2017 |
Filing
57
ORDER. Discovery Hearing set for 11/30/2017 at 11:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
July 6, 2017 |
Filing
52
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 26 defendant Naphcare, Inc.'s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall correct the caption to reflect that defendant Napha Healthcare is corre ctly identified as Naphcare, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall also forward this order to the Pro Bono Liaison. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
February 28, 2017 |
Filing
45
ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Strike Opposition and Denying 43 Motion to Strike Letter. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
December 22, 2016 |
Filing
29
ORDER that 26 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff Christopher Hunter's claims against Naphcare are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
December 30, 2015 |
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 14 Motion to Reattempt Service on Unserved Defendant. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a subpoena duces tecum be issued to the custodian of records at the Clark County Detention Center directing the custodian to determine the first and last name and last-known address of an officer McArthur who worked at the Clark County Detention Center in August, 2014. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve this subpoena, together with a copy of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - TR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?