Williams v. Wirtz Beverage Nevada Beer, Inc. et al
| Anna Williams |
| American Mart Corporation, Nico Amoroso, James P. Harrington, II, Wirtz Beverage Group and Wirtz Beverage Nevada Beer, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv01747 |
| October 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation of Dismissal. This Case is Dismissed With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that 16 Motion to Extend Time for Service of Process or, in the alternative, Motion to Serve by Publication is GRANTED. Williams has an additional 120 days from the date of this order to perfect service on Nico Amoroso and James Harrington by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Reschedule Early Neutral Evaluation Session. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 1/22/2015 10:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
