Morris v. American Reliable Insurance Company et al
| Robert Morris |
| American Reliable Insurance Company and Green Tree Servicing, LLC |
| 2:2014cv01998 |
| December 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Insurance |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER Granting 74 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 41(a) and 74 the parties' Joint Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1450 the state court shall RELEASE Plaintiff's funds to him. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER Granting 72 Stipulation for Continuance of Response Date re 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment on All Claims. Responses due by 8/15/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/12/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Granting 69 Stipulation for Continuance of Response Deadline re 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment on All Claims. Responses due by 8/8/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/26/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 66 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment on All Claims. Responses due by 7/25/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Green Trees Motion to Dismiss 45 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/24/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 48 Stipulation of Dismissal of all claims against ARIC, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/31/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 10 Defendant ARIC's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Green Tree's 16 Joinder to Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his amended Complaint by 7/22/2015. Failure to file a second amended complaint by this date shall result in the court DISMISSING claims with prejudice. (See Order for specific claims.) Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/8/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER that 34 Motion to Compel Discovery is granted as stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/1/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER vacating the order to show cause hearing set on April 30, 2015. Sanctions, including monetary sanctions and a recommendation for civil contempt, shall not be imposed on the parties at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/6/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 24 Stipulation to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
