Searcy v. Esurance Insurance Company
| Rosalind Searcy |
| Esurance Insurance Company |
| 2:2015cv00047 |
| January 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER granting 123 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice; Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/22/2018.; Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 104 Motion in Limine; ORDER granting 110 Motion in Limine; Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 96 Proposed Pretrial Order is REJECTED. The parties shall submit a proposed joint pretrial order that complies with Local Rules 16-3 and 16-4 by 6/23/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Fifth Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant Esurance Insurance Company's 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Directing the Parties to File Supplemental Briefs. Supplemental Briefs due by 3/6/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Sanctions and Denying Defendant's 78 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Gary Fye. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 08/01/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER declining expedited briefing and resolution re ECF No. 66 Motion for Sanctions. Motion will be briefed according to the default briefing schedule provided by the local rules, and the motion will be resolved by the Court in the ordinary course. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Granting Defendant's 59 Emergency Motion for Leave to Notice Second Deposition of Plaintiff. The hearing on the 59 motion scheduled for 03/14/2016 at 11:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe has been Vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 03/08/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER re 59 Emergency Motion. The Court hereby orders that any response must be filed no later than 03/03/2016, and any reply must be filed no later than 03/08/2016. The Court further sets a hearing on the motion for 11:00 a.m. on 03/14/2016, in Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 02/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER. The 54 Notice of Deposition shall be STRICKEN by the Clerk. The Court ORDERS the parties and counsel to cease filing discovery documents on the docket as required by Local Rule 26-8. Failure to abide by this order and Local Rule 26-8 may result in sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 01/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Esurance Insurance Company's 29 Motion for Protective Order and Granting 45 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Denying without Prejudice 29 Motion for Protective Order and 32 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/29/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Granting 23 Stipulation for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 19 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order filed by Rosalind Searcy. Discovery Plan due by 4/1/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Searcy v. Esurance Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Esurance Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Michelle D Alarie |
| Represented By: | Conor P. Flynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosalind Searcy | |
| Represented By: | James J Ream |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
