Aevoe Corp. v. i-Blason LLC
Aevoe Corp. |
i-Blason LLC |
2:2015cv00149 |
January 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Richard F. Boulware |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 CONSENT JUDGMENT and PERMANENT INJUNCTION. All claims asserted between the parties in this litigation are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this ConsentJudgment, Injunction, and the confidential Settlement Agreement of the parties. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 111 ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 109 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 102 ORDER Granting 101 Third Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines which modifies only the claim construction briefing schedule. All other dates remain the same (see Order for deadlines). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 90 ORDER re 89 Status Report. The stay of this case is lifted. The parties must file an amended discovery plan and scheduling order for the court's consideration or a joint status report informing the court that an amended discovery plan and scheduling order is not necessary by 8/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/2/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 84 ORDER that Defendant's 68 Motion to Stay Litigation is Granted in Part. The parties shall file a joint status report within five days of the issuance of the PTAB's decision on whether to institute an inter partes review, informing the Court of the PTAB's decision. Defendant's 70 Motion to Expedite is Denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 63 CONSENT ORDER for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/29/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 47 ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall strike Defendant's 46 Notice Regarding Discovery from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/1/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 45 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aevoe Corp. v. i-Blason LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aevoe Corp. | |
Represented By: | Josephine Binetti McPeak |
Represented By: | Jeffrey A Silvestri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: i-Blason LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.