Tagle v. Neven et al
Petitioner: Victor Tagle
Respondent: Warden Neven and The Attorney General of the State of Additional Respondent
Case Number: 2:2015cv00214
Filed: February 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Denying Petitioner's 20 Motion for Case Information. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/9/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER that this action is Dismissed with prejudice because it is untimely. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. A certificate of appealability is Denied. Petitioner's 16 Motion for Records/Court Documents is Granted in part. The Clerk of the Court shall send Petitioner a copy of the 5 Amended Petition and a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - documents mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file and serve a showing of cause why the court should not dismiss this action as untimely. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk of the court shall file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner has 30 days from the date that this order is entered in whic h to file an amended petition. Petitioner has 30 days from the date that this order is entered to show cause why the court should not dismiss this action for failure to exhaust available state-court remedies. The clerk shall add Adam Laxalt, Attorn ey General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance within 20 days of entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/17/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - 2254 instructions/form mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tagle v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Additional Respondent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Victor Tagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?