Smith v. Williams et al
| Robert F Smith |
| The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams |
| 2:2015cv00465 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 44 Smith's motion for stay and abeyance is DENIED. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 6 respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith must notify the court how he wishes to proceed with this action by 2/11/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 41 Smith's motion to stay is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 37 Motion to Extend Time To Respond to re 23 Motion to Dismiss ; Denying 38 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Responses due by 11/5/2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL) Modified on 10/5/2016 to correct text - (DL).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Screening Petition and Directing Response. Respondents must answer or otherwise respond to 21 Third-Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by July 21, 2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 9 Motion for Clarification and 10 Motion for Answer are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 11 and 19 Motions for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 13 Motion to Str ike is DENIED. Amended Petition due by 5/24/2016. The Clerk of Court is instructed to STRIKE 18 second-amended petition from the record in this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of the first amended petition 5 and this order. In addition, the Clerk shall return to petitioner a copy of the first amended petition 5 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents will have 45 days from service of the petition to answer or otherwise respond to it. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Denying 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Filing fee due within 30 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner two copies of this order. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
