Strong v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Robert H. Strong |
Clark County Detention Center, Hans #6999 and NAPH Care |
2:2015cv00480 |
March 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Order Dismissing Without Prejudice Defendant Hans #6999 and Naph Care. Because those are the only remaining defendants in this matter, this case is dismissed. The clerk of the court is directed to close this file. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 2 ORDER that 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice to file a new application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL SEND Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pa uperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: pay filing fee or file application. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint but shall not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/18/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.