Harlan v. Williams et al
Petitioner: Will Henry Harlan
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams
Case Number: 2:2015cv00799
Filed: April 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER that Petitioner's 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice to his ability to file a new, separate petition. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that Petitioner's 22 Motion to Stay and Abey is Denied. Petitioner has until 2/12/2018 to submit a sworn declaration stating either (1) that he abandons his unexhausted claims or (2) that he will return to state court to exhaust his unexhausted claims. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
December 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 17 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner must dispatch a response to the 15 Order notifying the court how he wishes to proceed in this action by 1/22/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - two copies of Order and one copy of docket sheet mailed to Petitioner at HDSP and ESP - SLD)
September 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER that 7 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Response. The Clerk will file and electronically serve the 1 -1 Petition on the Respondents and add Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt to the CM/ECF docket sheet. Respondents have until 12/28/2015 to answer or respond to the Petition. All state court record exhibits must be forwarded to the staff attorneys in the Reno Division of the Clerk of Court. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harlan v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian E. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Will Henry Harlan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?