Welch v. White et al
Michael Welch |
Laborers Local 872 Union and Thomas White |
2:2015cv00940 |
May 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Lloyd D. George |
Peggy A. Leen |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL) |
Filing 9 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Michael Welch shall file a notice with the court disclosing all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) that have a direct, pecuniary interest in th e outcome of the case no later than December 7, 2015. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 6 ORDER Denying as Moot 3 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall file 1 -2 Complaint and issue summons for defendants Thomas White and Laborers Union Local 782. Plaintiff must complete service by 2/5/16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/8/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.