Shade et al v. State of Nevada et al
| Lowell Shade and Rhonda Shade |
| A. Ash, City of Las Vegas, Clark County, T. Collins, Grimmett, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, McGrath, J. Smith and State of Nevada |
| 2:2015cv01016 |
| June 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 54) is GRANTED and the case is closed. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CVL)
|
|
Filing
81
REVISED ORDER that 79 Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall have until September 18, 2017, in which to retain substitute counsel who shall make an appearance in accordance with the requirements of the Local Rules of Practice, or shall file a notice with the court that they will be appearing in this matter pro se. Plaintiffs' failure to timely comply with this order by either obtaining substitute counsel, or filing a notice that they will be appearing pro se , may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include a recommendation to the district judge that plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The clerk of the court shall serve the plaintiffs with a copy of this order at their last known address. FURTHER ORDERED that 78 Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Granting 66 Stipulation re 54 MOTION to Dismiss . ( Motion Hearing reset for 11/3/2016 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7C before Judge Richard F. Boulware II.) Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/14/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that 31 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines is DENIED without prejudice. A temporary stay of discovery is entered pending a decision on the Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Amend/Correct the Complaint. The parties shall have fourteen days from decision on the Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Amend the Complaint, whichever is later, in which to submit a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order. Defendants' Motion to Strike 36 is DENIED to the extent it seeks to strike Plaintiffs' reply to the motion to amend/correct complaint.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) Modified on 5/10/2016 - nef regenerated (MMM).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER that 23 Motion to Substitute Attorney is GRANTED. Attorney Robert J. Gower is substituted in place and stead of Stephanie A. Barker for Clark County. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Granting 19 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 15 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/11/2015. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/2/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER that 9 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 5 Amended Complaint is GRANTED. John Collins answer due 11/16/2015; Jarrod Grimmett answer due 11/16/2015; Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department answer due 11/16/2015; J. Smith answer due 11/16/2015. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/26/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
