Ruediger et al v. Zuffa, LLC
| Mac Danzig and Gabe Ruediger |
| Zuffa, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01057 |
| June 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER Denying 16 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER to Consolidate. It is ORDERED that 2:15-cv-1046-RCJ-NJK; 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF; 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF; 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH is/are consolidated under 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REASSIGNED to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II, and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Transfer Case. The Clerk shall TRANSFER the above-captioned actions to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division, and close this court's files. All matters calendared before the undersigned are VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/2/2015. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2015) [Transferred from California Northern on 6/4/2015.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
