Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Talasera and Vicanto Homeowners' Association et al
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| SFR Investments Pool I, LLC and Talasera and Vicanto Homeowners' Association |
| 2:2015cv01139 |
| June 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
JUDGMENT in favor of SFR Investments Pool I, LLC against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Granting SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's 108 Motion for Entry of Judgment. SFR shall within 10 days of the entry of this order prepare and file an appropriate judgment for the court's signature. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER Granting Defendant Talasera and Vicanto Homeowners' Association's 100 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER Granting 102 Stipulation to Dismiss Without Prejudice SFR's Third Claim for Relief for Slander of Title Claim against Deutsche Bank and Nationstar. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER that the HOA's 72 Motion to Dismiss is Granted in part and Denied in part. SFR's 62 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted in part and Denied in part. The Bank's 89 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying Defendant Talasera and Vicanto Homeowners' Association's 84 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 90 Emergency Motion to Stay Briefing and/or Litigation. This matter is Stayed until 30 days after the order of mandate is entered in Bourne Valley v. Wells Fargo Bank, Case No 13-cv-0649 JCM-GWF. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER Denying 83 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 81 defendant's reply, be, and the same hereby is, STRICKEN from the record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall have seven (7) days from the date of this order to file a reply to 78 lenders' response that complies with the page limit provided by the local rules. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 52 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Bank of America. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the stay in this matter is LIFTED. The discovery cutoff is 5/20/2016 and the parties shall comply with the deadlines established by the 24 Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
