Stillwell v. SLH Vista, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Brittany Ann Stillwell
Defendant: SLH Vista, Inc. and Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Case Number: 2:2015cv01173
Filed: June 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER DENYING without prejudice Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Vacate Court's Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 41 Motion to Amend this Court's Order on Defendant's 41 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 42 Motion to vacate, amend and for relief is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/5/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
September 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER Transferring Venue to the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) Modified text on 9/23/2015 (EDS).
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant SLH Vista, Inc.'s 8 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant SLH Vista, Inc.'S 8 Motion to Transfer Venue is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that Defendant SLH Vista, Inc. will prepare an appropriate order transferring venue to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, and submit the same for signature. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
August 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Denying as Moot 21 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Clerk's Default. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Denying 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until 8/17/15, in which to submit the completed application or pay the filing fee. Failure to comply with this Order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/13/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stillwell v. SLH Vista, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SLH Vista, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Ann Stillwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?