Team One Display Services, Inc. v. Arlon Graphics, LLC
Plaintiff: Team One Display Services, Inc.
Defendant: Arlon Graphics, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv01185
Filed: June 22, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation Extending Last Date to Disclose Rebuttal Experts. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
August 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER Granting 75 Stipulation re 68 MOTION to Strike 65 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/10/2016. Replies due by 8/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
July 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER Granting 71 Stipulation To Stay Briefing On 65 Motion to Dismiss pending decision on 68 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
June 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER denying ECF No. 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying ECF No. 52 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order; and directing defendant to file amended motion to dismiss, if any, within 7 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 50 Motion to Strike is GRANTED. Defendants argument regarding Plaintiffs ability torecover fees, costs, and damages shall be stricken from 48 Reply to Response to Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that sur-reply is due Replies due by 1/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation to Continue Hearing re 23 Motion to Stay filed by Arlon Graphics, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/16/2015 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Team One Display Services, Inc. v. Arlon Graphics, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arlon Graphics, LLC
Represented By: Keith R Denny
Represented By: David M. Korrey
Represented By: William R Simon, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Team One Display Services, Inc.
Represented By: Robert W. Hernquist
Represented By: Kimberly P. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?