Team One Display Services, Inc. v. Arlon Graphics, LLC
| Team One Display Services, Inc. |
| Arlon Graphics, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01185 |
| June 22, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER Granting 77 Stipulation Extending Last Date to Disclose Rebuttal Experts. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Filing
76
ORDER Granting 75 Stipulation re 68 MOTION to Strike 65 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 8/10/2016. Replies due by 8/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Filing
74
ORDER Granting 71 Stipulation To Stay Briefing On 65 Motion to Dismiss pending decision on 68 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying ECF No. 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying ECF No. 52 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order; and directing defendant to file amended motion to dismiss, if any, within 7 days. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Filing
59
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/24/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Filing
55
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 50 Motion to Strike is GRANTED. Defendants argument regarding Plaintiffs ability torecover fees, costs, and damages shall be stricken from 48 Reply to Response to Motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that sur-reply is due Replies due by 1/22/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 27 Stipulation to Continue Hearing re 23 Motion to Stay filed by Arlon Graphics, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/16/2015 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Team One Display Services, Inc. v. Arlon Graphics, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arlon Graphics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Keith R Denny |
| Represented By: | David M. Korrey |
| Represented By: | William R Simon, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Team One Display Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Hernquist |
| Represented By: | Kimberly P. Stein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.