Dearman v. Colvin
| Michael W. Dearman |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| 2:2015cv01447 |
| July 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
CLERK'S JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Michael W. Dearman against Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall SUBSTITUTE Nancy A. Berryhill for Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 22 Plaintiff Michael W. Dearman's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand is DENIED . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 28 the Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Remand is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's final decision in this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ON STIPULATION Granting 21 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Motion for Remand and/or Reversal. Motions due by 5/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/25/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation. Carolyn W. Colvin answer due 3/13/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall issue summons to the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada and deliver the summons and 6 Amended Complaint to the U.S. Marshal for service. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration by sending a copy of the summons and 6 Amended Complaint by certified mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/07/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall file the Complaint, but shall not issue summons. The Complaint is Dismissed with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 11/27/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dearman v. Colvin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael W. Dearman | |
| Represented By: | Marc V Kalagian |
| Represented By: | Leonard H Stone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
