Lasko v. American College of Phlebology et al
| Reverend Doctor Keith Alan Lasko |
| American College of Phlebology, Michael Armitage, Stephen F. Daughterty, M.D., Mark Forrestal, M.D., Bruce Sanders, Mangesh Tarte, M.D. and Caryl Tynan |
| 2:2015cv01538 |
| August 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Default Judgment is Denied as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 02/11/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 15 Petition Regarding Damages and 16 Request for Sanctions for Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Obstruction of Justice are DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that 18 Motion to Strike 17 Objection to Document is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/13/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
10
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Keith Alan Lasko and against Mangesh Tarte, M.D.. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/28/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
