Kingham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Kathryn Kingham |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, IL |
2:2015cv01555 |
August 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
George Foley |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER Granting 57 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 48 ORDER Granting 47 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Joint Pre-Trial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 46 ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation for Extension of Time to file Joint Pre-Trial Order (Second Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/14/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 44 ORDER Granting 43 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 42 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 31 defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting 39 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 4/20/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 38 ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation for Extension of Time to file Reply re 31 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request). Replies due by 4/6/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 35 ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation to Extend Time to File a Response re 31 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/9/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company answer due 10/28/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/28/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kingham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathryn Kingham | |
Represented By: | William R. Brenske |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, IL | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.