United States of America ex rel v. Clark County et al
United States of America ex rel |
Clark County, Clark County Department of Aviation and McCarran International Airport |
Cheryl Nolte |
2:2015cv01621 |
December 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C. Mahan |
Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Clark County, The Clark County Department of Aviation, and McCarran International Airport and against Plaintiff Cheryl Nolte in the amount of $283,251.46. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/22/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 97 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 93 defendants Clark County,The Clark County Department of Aviation, and McCarran International Airport's motion for attorney's fees be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that defendants Clark County, The Clark County Departmentof Aviation, and McCarran International Airport shall file a proposed judgment consistent withthis order within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC) |
Filing 82 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in the amount of $133,896.22 in favor of Clark County, Clark County Department of Aviation, McCarran International Airport against Cheryl Nolte. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 76 ORDERED that 52 Motion for Attorney's Fees is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 55 Motion to Exclude Prohibited Character Attacks is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Clark County, The Clark County Department of Aviation, and McCarran International Airport shall file proposed judgments consistent with this order within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 47 ORDER that the status hearing scheduled for 10:00 A.M., December 27, 2017, is VACATED and RESCHEDULED to 10:00 A.M., January 3, 2018, in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/16/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 43 ORDER that a Hearing re 41 Motion for Removal of Gerard Dondero, Esq. from Future References as Counsel is scheduled for 6/29/2017 at 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 39 ORDER that a Hearing re 35 Motion to Stay Discovery is scheduled for 6/29/2017 at 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 ORDER that 23 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Responses due by 4/19/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 11 ORDER that should the relator or any defendant propose that the present action be dismissed or otherwise discontinued, that party shall concurrently provide notice of that proposition to the United States. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.