Bank of America, N.A. v. Premier One Holdings, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant: Cactus Creek at Mountain's Edge Homeowners' Association, Inc, Premier One Holdings, Inc., THL Family Investment LLC and Ticor Title Company
Counter Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Counter Claimant: Premier One Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2015cv01731
Filed: September 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER for Entry of Final Judgment. IT IS ORDERED the clerk of court to add Wei Wei Chen as a defendant and terminate THL Family Investments, LLC as a defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the clerk of court to enter final judgment in favor of plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. and against defendants Wei Wei Chen and Premier One Holdings, Inc. as follows: It is hereby declared that the non-judicial foreclosure sale conducted by Cactus Creek at Mountains Edge Homeowners Association, Inc. on 5/10/2013 did not extinguish the deed of trust and the property located at 10609 Cave Ridge Street in Las Vegas, Nevada remains subject to the deed of trust. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER Granting 89 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER Granting 79 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 69 Motion for Summary Judgment, 71 Motion for Summary Judgment and 72 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Replies due by 2/28/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Granting 65 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 61 Order. The parties stipulate and agree to allow BANA to file the amended complaint deleting its Supremacy Clause arguments, clarifying its tender allegations, and updating the def endant/purchaser attached as Exhibit A within 14 days of the order granting this stipulation. The parties further stipulate and agree the parties shall have until 1/17/2020 to file dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Granting 62 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 11/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 58 the motion to lift stay is GRANTED. The stay in this case is lifted for all purposes. A client representative must attend the meet and confer, either in person or by telephone. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting 55 Motion to Substitute Attorney for Cactus Creek at Mountain's Edge Homeowners' Association, Inc. Sean L. Anderson and T. Chase Pittsenbarger of Leach Kern Gruchow Anderson Song are substituted in the place of Elizabeth Lowell, James Pengilly, and Chad Fuss of the Robbins Law Firm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 53 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Sarah Morris and Timothy A Wiseman are substituted in place of Joseph Y Hong for Premier One Holdings, Inc.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER that 38 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED this case is administratively STAYED until the Ninth Circuit issues the mandate in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, case number 15-15233 (2:13-cv-649-PMP-NJK). Once the mandate issues, any party may move to lift the stay. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER that the party challenging Chapter 116's constitutionality in each of these cases must serve the Nevada Attorney General with the complaint, motion, or other filing that calls into question Chapter 116's constitutionality, and shall file proof of compliance within 10 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER CERTIFYING CASE TO NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of America, N.A. v. Premier One Holdings, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Ariel E. Stern
Represented By: Donna M. Wittig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Ariel E. Stern
Represented By: Donna M. Wittig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cactus Creek at Mountain's Edge Homeowners' Association, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Premier One Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph Y Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THL Family Investment LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ticor Title Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Premier One Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph Y Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?