Mehmood v. Brennan et al
| Yasir Mehmood |
| Judge Brennan, AUSA Heiko Cuppola, Judge Dale A. Drozd, Cheif Judge England, Inspector Havez, Judge Mendez, AUSA Michelle Rodriguez, Jeffrey AUSA Spivak, United States Marshal Service, United States of America and Benjamin Wagner |
| 2:2015cv01739 |
| September 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER that this court certifies this appeal is not taken in good faith. Petitioner's 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/19/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USCA - SLD)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Granting Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner will not be required to pay the filing fee for this action. The Clerk of the Court shall separately file the petition for writ of habeas co rpus. This action is DISMISSED and Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
