Above the Ceiling, LLC v. Western Architectural Services, LLC et al
| Above the Ceiling, LLC |
| Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Haskell Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Western Architectural Services, LLC |
| 2:2015cv01766 |
| September 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| George Foley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER granting 74 Motion to Enforce; ORDER withdrawing 76 Report and Recommendation; ORDER adopting 79 Report and Recommendation; Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER that 70 Koch & Scow LLC's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Western Architectural Services, LLC must retain new counsel if it intends to continue to litigate this matter. Defendant has until No vember 30, 2018 to advise the Court if it will retain new counsel. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add the last known address of Defendant Western Architectural Services, LLC to the civil docket and serve Defendant Western Architectural Services, LLC with a copy of this order at their last known address. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 63 Stipulation to Extend Deadline. The parties have until May 9, 2018, to file either the joint pretrial order or a stipulation and proposed order dismissing this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 61 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/8/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER that the parties shall file a Joint Pretrial Order no later than December 12,2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than May 29, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER that Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than May 12, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Granting 30 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 12/12/2016. Motions due by 1/18/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/27/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 9/20/2016. Motions due by 10/20/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
