Boyd v. Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Boyd v. Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen

Boyd v. Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen

Plaintiff:	Nicki Boyd
Defendant:	Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen
Case Number:	2:2015cv01814
Filed:	September 21, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge:	Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit:	Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 22, 2016	Filing 5 ORDER Accepting and Adopting in full the 4 Amended Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the Plaintiff's ability to commence a new ac tion in which she either pays the appropriate filing fee in full or submits a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 30, 2015	Filing 2 ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall retain the 1 -1 Complaint. Plaintiff shall have until 12/30/2015 to file a new IFP application or pay the filing fee of $350.00 accompanied with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - IFP instructions/form mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 22, 2016

Filing 5 ORDER Accepting and Adopting in full the 4 Amended Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the Plaintiff's ability to commence a new ac tion in which she either pays the appropriate filing fee in full or submits a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

November 30, 2015

Filing 2 ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall retain the 1 -1 Complaint. Plaintiff shall have until 12/30/2015 to file a new IFP application or pay the filing fee of $350.00 accompanied with a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - IFP instructions/form mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicki Boyd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Detention Center Kitchen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?