Castro et al v. Poulton et al
| Azucena Castro, Claudia E Castro and Jose Silvestre Castro |
| Craig Stuart Poulton and USF Reddaway, Inc. |
| 2:2015cv01908 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER Granting 104 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER Granting 100 Stipulation for Exemption from Attendance at Settlement Conference re 97 Order Scheduling Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/11/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
99
SECOND AMENDED ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 51 plaintiff's motion to strike be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 59 plaintiff's motion in limine #1 be, and the same hereby i s, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60 plaintiff's motion in limine #2 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 61 plaintiff's motion in limine #3 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 62 plaintiff's motion in limine #4 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 63 plaintiff's motion in limine #5 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 78 plaintiff's motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 51 defendant Castro's motion to strike be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 59 defendant Castro's motion in limine #1 be, and the same hereby is, GRA NTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60 defendant Castro's motion in limine #2 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 61 defendant Castro's motion in limin e #3 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 62 defendant Castro's motion in limine #4 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 63 defendant Castro's motion in limine #5 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 78 defendant Castro's motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Granting 93 Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference. (Settlement Conference reset for 8/21/2017 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr.) Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER Granting 91 Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference. ( Settlement Conference reset for 8/9/2017 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr.) Confidential settlement conference statements are due on 8/2/17 according to 90 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 79 Defendants' Motion to Strike Reply isgranted. The Clerk of Court shall strike 64 Plaintiffs Reply to her Motion to Strike defenseexpert Jack Broadhurst.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 80 Defendants' Mo tion to Strike Replies isgranted. The Clerk of Court shall strike 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 Plaintiffs Replies to her Motions in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Granting 66 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Jay Joseph Schuttert terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 48 Stipulation to Continue Hearings on Motions re 44 Motion to Quash Subpoena and 45 Motion to Compel. Hearing reset for 3/30/17 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3A. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 33 Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their First Amended Answer on or before 1/27/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Denying 29 Motion to Strike Deposition Testimony of Jose Salud Castro and Carolina Tafoya-De-Castro without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 12/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation re 25 MOTION in Limine #1 To Preclude Defendants From Presenting A Fraud Defense At Trial.( Responses due by 10/7/2016.) Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation Dismissing without Prejudice Plaintiff's Fourth through Seventh Causes of Action. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/15/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
