Vidal v. Schmitt et al
Plaintiff: Francisco Vidal
Defendant: Enrique Hernandez, Matthew Jogodka, Joe Lombardo, Cynthia Sauchak and Joseph Schmitt
Case Number: 2:2015cv01943
Filed: October 8, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Boulware
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER TO PRODUCE FRANCISCO VIDAL, #0094910. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 34 the Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice to it being filed after any decision on dispositive motions in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 55 , 64 , 83 Motions for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 63 , 68 , 76 , 77 , 79 , 84 the Discover Motions are DENIED without prejudice to the underlying issues being raised at the oral argument on dispositive motions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument is set in this case for 4/20/18 at 1:00 p.m. on 89 the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shall order that the Plaintiffs be produced if they are still incarcerated at that time. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
November 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER directing Plaintiff Sandra Scharas to file a notice of current address with the court by 12/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 56 , 57 , 58 Plaintiff Francisco Vidal's motions to compel are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 49 the Motion to Take Incarcerated Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition is Granted. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Vidal's Deposition be taken on 11/30/17 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
November 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must mail copies of 48 the court's order to show cause to Plaintiffs Sandra Scharas and Francisco Vidal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Sandra Scharas and Francisco Vidal's deadline to respond to the order to show cause is extended to 11/21/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 11/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Mueller must serve a copy of this order and the 29 scheduling order on Plaintiffs and file proof of that service by 9/29/17. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by 10/10/17, Plaintiffs must file a notice stating whether they intend to represent themselves or retain an attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
August 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Denying 36 Motion to Extend Time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Craig Mueller must serve a copy of this order on Plaintiffs and file proof of that service by 9/1/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vidal v. Schmitt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enrique Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Jogodka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Lombardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cynthia Sauchak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Schmitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?