Norton, III v. Williams et al
| Joseph Martin Norton, III |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams |
| 2:2015cv01982 |
| October 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk sh all add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada as counsel for respondents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall electronically serve upon respondents a copy of this order. No response is necessary. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date that this order is entered to have the filing fee of five dollars ($5.00) sent to the clerk of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF: 2 copies to petitioner - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
