Alfaro et al v. D. Las Vegas, Inc. et al
Samantha Alfaro and Gregory John Torrez |
D. Las Vegas, Inc. and Edgar Vinicio Vallejo |
D. Las Vegas, Inc. |
Gregory John Torrez |
2:2015cv02190 |
November 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Miranda M. Du |
Peggy A. Leen |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER re ECF No. 59 Letter for status check : The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50 ) does not require expedited disposition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 54 ORDER overruling Plaintiff Gregory John Torrez's ECF No. 42 Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order, affirming the Magistrate Judge's order. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 38 ORDER - 1. Defendants' Motion to Strike Torrez's Future Damages Calculation (ECF No. 23 ) and Motion to Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Expert Testimony (ECF Nos. 24 ) are GRANTED. 2. Counter-Defendant's Motion to Preclud e Plaintiffs from Offering Expert Testimony (ECF Nos. 26 ) and Motion to Strike Report of Dr. Enrico Fazzini (ECF No. 27 ) are GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/24/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.