Navarro v. The Hon Mr Potter et al
Jim Navarro |
Hon. Donahue, Renee Kern, Hon. Potter, United States Government and John Unknown |
2:2015cv02223 |
November 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A. Dorsey |
Cam Ferenbach |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 6 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against the Honorable Brian Sandoval are DISMISSED with prejudice; all claims against defendant Renee Kern in her official capacity are DISMISSED with prejudice; and all claims against the Honorable Mr. Potter are DISMISSED with prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against the United States Government, Dana Urbanski, the Honorable Donahue, and John Doe are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Jim Navarros is instructed that, if he wishes to file an amended complaint to cure these deficiencies, he must do so by 1/22/15. Navarro's failure to file an amended complaint by 1/22/15, will result in dismissal of this entire case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.