Schultz v. State of Nevada et al
| Lee Michael Schultz |
| Attorney General, D. Warden and State of Nevada |
| 2:2015cv02325 |
| December 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this action shall be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice.IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have sixty (60) days within which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a new and properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis together with a properly executed financial certificate and an inmate account statement. The Clerk of Court shall SEND petitioner two copies of an in forma pauperis application form for incarcerated persons along with one copy of the instructions for same. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
