Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. v. Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD et al
| Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. |
| James P Ahern, Matthew D Eitner and Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD |
| Sheeram Agharkar, Chuck Casamento, Paul Kelly, Relmada Therapeutics, Inc., Sandesh Seth, Maged Shenouda and Sergio Traversa |
| James P Ahern, Matthew D Eitner and Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD |
| 2:2015cv02338 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 54 Defendants' motion to transfer venue is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the Southern District of New York. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions in this case are DENIED without prejudice to their reassertion in the transferee forum. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 67 Stipulation for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Plaintiff and Countertclaim Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 09/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Granting 47 Stipulation Extending the Deadline for Defendants/Counterclaimants to Respond to the Amended Complaint and to file an Amended Coutnerclaim. The Laidlaw Parties shall have until 4/4/16 to answer or otherwise respond to theAmended Complaint and to file an Amended Counterclaim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/10/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 39 and Counterclaim Defendants' Motion to Partially Dismiss Counterclaim 38 . Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 39 shall be Granted. Motion to Partially Dismiss Counterclaim by Counter Defendants 38 is withdrawn as Moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 22 Counterclaim. Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. answer due 1/25/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
31
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Granted. See Order for details. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/22/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to file an opposition brief and for plaintiff to file a reply brief 21 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Plaintiff's Reply brief is due on 12/18/15, pursuant to this Court's previous order 16 . Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER re Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 12/15/2015. Motion Hearing set for 12/22/2015 at 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. A nominal bond of $500.00 shall be required. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
