Blackwelder v. Thornton et al
| Donald Blackwelder |
| Aecos, LTD, Brian Howells and Charles Thornton |
| 2:2015cv02373 |
| December 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have until 10/24/18 to file a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Stipulation of Dismissal are due by 8/31/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the settling parties shall have until 7/27/18 to file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 7/20/18 to correct filing and signature date.
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the following discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines shall apply: Discovery due by 7/9/2018. Motions due by 8/8/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/7/2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Aecos shall have until 6 /1/18 to retain counsel who shall make an appearance in this case in accordance with the requirements of the Local Rules of practice unless it has executed a settlement agreement and applied to the New Jersey Court in which the receivership is pending for approval. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant/Crossdefendant/Crossclaimant Brian Howells shall have until 3/20/18, in which to retain substitute counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for 10:00 a.m., 2/20/18, is VACATE D and CONTINUED to 9:30 a.m., 3/27/18, in Courtroom 3B. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall have until 3/23/18 to file a joint status report advising whether the case has settled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Defendants/Crossdefendants/Crossclaimants as noted in order - ADR)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 46 Plaintiff's Request to Cancel the 1/26/17, Settlement Conference to be Conducted by The Hon. Carl. W. Hoffman, U.S. Magistrate Court Judge is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re 38 Order for Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order. IT IS ORDERED that, with respect to filing documents under seal, the parties must comply with: (1) the Local Rules of Practice regarding electronic filing and f iling under seal, (2) the Ninth Circuits opinions in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016), and (3) the CM/ECF filing instructions stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Granting 33 Stipulation Setting a Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
