Santal et al v. Fratto et al
| Jamie Shuey, Terry Richmond, Leann Garcia, Tanya Abiley, Priscella Saintal, Precious Corley, Angela Cody, Julie Lingafelter, Rochalonn M. Chapman, Jamie Sexton, Miriam Oku, Jennifer Anzalone, Carla Hawkins, Jamie Hein, Toni Fratto, Susanne Carno and Rosalind Fletcher |
| Adam Laxalt, Brian Sandoval, Brian Connett, James G. Cox and Barbara Cevaske |
| 2:2015cv02378 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #5 Screening Order, addressed to Julie Lingafelter. (PS) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiffs, Angela Cody, Carla Hawkins, Jamie Hein, Jamie Sexton, Jamie Shuey, Jennifer Anzalone, Julie Lingafelter, Leann Garcia, Miriam Oku, Precious Corley, Priscella Saintal, Rochalonn M. Chapman, Rosalind Fletcher, Susanne Carno, Tanya Abiley, Terry Richmond, and Toni Fratto. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 4/20/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) (Main Document 7 replaced on 4/20/2016) (PS). (Main Document 7 replaced on 4/20/2016) (PS). |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Precious Corley, Julie Lingafelter, Susanne Carno, Rochalonn M. Chapman, Priscella Saintal, Jamie Shuey, Jamie Hein, Carla Hawkins, Tanya Abiley, Jennifer Anzalone, Rosalind Fletcher, Jamie Sexton, Miriam Oku, Angela Cody, Terry Richmond, Leann Garcia, and Toni Fratto. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 4/30/2016. Proof of service due by 7/19/2016. (PS) |
Filing 5
SCREENING ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is denied as moot.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the complaint [1-2].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiffs the approved form for filing a 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of their original complaint [1-2].IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may not file any more documents in this current case.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may each initiate their own individual lawsuits by submitting an individual application to proceed in forma pauperis and an individual complaint to the Clerk of the Court.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/20/16. (copy of complaint sent to P)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER from Priscella Saintal regarding incorrect parties. (PS) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe, on 2/29/2016. MOTIONS: A document requesting a Court order must be styled as a motion, not a letter (see F.R.C.P. 7). Letters to a judge will be disregarded. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (RT) |
| Filing 2 Submission of PROPOSED ORDER on #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; filed by Plaintiff Priscella Santal. (TR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Priscella Santal. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Complaint)(TR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.