Greene v. State of Nevada et al
Delbert M Greene |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and State of Nevada |
2:2015cv02470 |
December 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's 1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is Granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall detach and file the 1 -1 Petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 1 -1 Petition is Dismissed with prejudice as successive. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's 2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is Denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. The Clerk shall electronically serve respondents with a copy of the petition and a copy of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 04/15/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.