Yager v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Robin Rose Peterson Yager
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv00051
Filed: January 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER that 23 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.FURTHER ORDERED that 14 Plaintiff Robin Rose Peterson Yager's Motion to Modify, Reverse, or Remand is DENIED.FURTHER ORDERED that 18 the Commissioner's Cr oss-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED.FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk's Office shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 14 Motion to Modify Reverse or Remand be DENIED. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that 18 the Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Affirmance be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER that 20 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically is GRANTED with provision as enumerated in the order. FURTHER ORDERED that 21 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 14 Motion for Reversal is GRANTED. Replies due by 6/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER that 16 Motion to Extend Response Deadline is GRANTED. ORDERED that the Commissioner will have until 3/24/17 to file a response/cross-motion to affirm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion to Appear Telephonically (contained within 10 Response to Order to Show Cause). Defendant may appear telephonically at the show cause hearing scheduled for 11:00 a.m., November 21, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the show cause hearing scheduled for 11:00 a.m., November 18, 2016 is VACATED and RESCHEDULED to 11:00 a.m., November 21, 2016, in Courtroom 3D. Plaintiff must appear in person at the hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/3/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yager v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Timothy R. Bolin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Rose Peterson Yager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?