Cepero v. Williams et al
| Billy Cepero |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams |
| 2:2016cv00204 |
| February 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER Denying Petitioner's 47 Motion for Copies. Respondents' 33 Motion to Dismiss is Granted. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting Petitioner's 39 Motion to Extend Time Re: 33 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner's Responses due by 6/25/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Granting Respondents' 27 Second Motion to Extend Time Re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents' answer due by 4/9/2018. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue with respect to the 25 Notice of Appeal. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Denying Petitioner's 10 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Petitioner's 15 Motion for Consideration is Denied. Respondents' 13 Motion to Extend Time is Granted. Respondents have 45 days from the date of entry of this order to respond to the 1 Petition. Petitioner's 14 Motion to Strike is Denied as moot. Petitioner's 16 Motion to Correct Facts is Granted. Respondents' 17 Motion for Late Filing is Granted. Petitioner's 11 Motion requesting the court to direct the Nevada Department of Corrections to provide recordings is Denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER that the clerk of the court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents. Respondents shall have 45 days from the date on which the petition was served to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall beforwarded to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Petitioner's 7 Motion to Reopen Case is Denied and Petitioner's 8 Motion for Reconsideration is Denied. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Order and Petition electronically served on Attorney General; Petition mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that petitioner shall file an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. In the alternative, petitioner shall make the necessary arrangements to pa y the filing fee of $5.00. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date that this order is entered to comply. Petitioner's 2 Motion to open/refile new habeas petition is Denied as moot and Petitioner's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied as moot. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - IFP instructions/form mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
