Bank of America, N.A. v. Wildcreek Homeowners Association et al
Bank of America, N.A. |
Gayle A. Kern, Ltd., Phil Frink & Associates, Inc. and Wildcreek Homeowners Association |
2:2016cv00249 |
February 8, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER that the party challenging Chapter 116's constitutionality in each of these cases must serve the Nevada Attorney General with the complaint, motion, or other filing that calls into question Chapter 116's constitutionality, and shall file proof of compliance within 10 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/18/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 10 ORDER Certifying Case to Nevada Attorney General. The Attorney General for the State of Nevada has 60 days from the date of this Order to intervene in this action if it chooses to do so. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/9/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - mailed via certified mail - SLD) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. to file its Responsive Pleading (First Request). Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. answer due 3/31/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.