Astrabrands L.V. Inc. v. Global Expo Tranz LLC et al
| Astrabrands LV. Inc. |
| Global Expo Tranz LLC, New England Motor Freight, Inc., Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc. and RR Donnelley Logistics Services Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00302 |
| February 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE - Conference call held on 9/13/2016 before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Judicial Assistant: Teresa Hoskin; Pla Counsel: Pamela McKay; Def Counsel for Global Expo Tranz, LLC: Michael Ernst; De f Counsel for New England Motor Freight, Inc.: Steven Abbott; Def Counsel for RR Donnelley Logistics Worldwide, Inc.: Anthony Wong; Counsel for Oak Harbor Freight Lines, Inc.: David Koch, Paul Graves; Court Reporter/FTR #: None; Time of Hearing: 2:05 p.m. - 2:18 p.m.; The 51 , 52 , and 54 Motions for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Settlement Conference are Denied. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
34
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT and PROTECTIVE ORDER re ECF No. 25 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/2/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
