Cunningham v. Williams et al
Tony L. Cunningham |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams |
2:2016cv00388 |
February 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 9 petitioner's belated motion for enlargement of time is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus ) is DENIED. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 2 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is Denied. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order is entered to have the filing fee of $5.00 sent to the clerk of the court. Failure to comply will result in the dismissal of this action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send Petitioner two copies of this order. Petitioner is ordered to make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/25/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.