Romero-De-Mendoza v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Nevada District Court Romero-De-Mendoza v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Romero-De-Mendoza v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Bertha Romero-De-Mendoza
Defendant:	Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2016cv00664
Filed:	March 25, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge:	James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2016	Filing 20 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge Leen's 19 Report and Recommendation.The case is Dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand to State Court is Denied as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/30/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 8, 2016	Filing 16 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Withdraw Attorneys Adam Smith and Corey Eschweiler. Plaintiff shall have until 7/5/2016 to retain substitute counsel or shall file a notice with the court that she will be appearing in this matte r pro se. Status Check set for 7/19/2016 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/8/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy mailed to Plaintiff- see Order for address - SLD) Modified on 6/9/2016 to correct date to retain substitute counsel (SLD).

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2016

Filing 20 ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge Leen's 19 Report and Recommendation.The case is Dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's 4 Motion to Remand to State Court is Denied as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/30/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

June 8, 2016

Filing 16 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Withdraw Attorneys Adam Smith and Corey Eschweiler. Plaintiff shall have until 7/5/2016 to retain substitute counsel or shall file a notice with the court that she will be appearing in this matte r pro se. Status Check set for 7/19/2016 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/8/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy mailed to Plaintiff- see Order for address - SLD) Modified on 6/9/2016 to correct date to retain substitute counsel (SLD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero-De-Mendoza v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bertha Romero-De-Mendoza
Represented By:	Corey M Eschweiler
Represented By:	Adam D Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Represented By:	Brenda H Entzminger
Represented By:	Christopher W Tinsman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?