Sheppard v. Visa Department Stores National Bank et al
| Maria E. Sheppard |
| Bank of America N.A, Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Visa Department Stores National Bank |
| 2:2016cv00714 |
| March 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER that Plaintiff Maria E. Sheppard and Defendant Visa Department Stores National Bank shall file a stipulation to dismiss or a joint status report on or before 3/17/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER for Status Report. The parties shall file a stipulation to dismiss or a joint status report on or before 1/27/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 09/06/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Motion to Dismiss Bank of America, NA with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
