CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
| CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games LLC and Interactive Games Limited |
| DraftKings, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00781 |
| April 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER granting in part and denying in part ECF No. 37 Motion to Dismiss. The claims for infringement of the '924, '628, '394, '417, '169, '511, and '166 Patents are dismissed under 35 U.S.C. § 101, with leave to amend to allege infringement of claims that do not depend from the invalid claims identified in this Order. The motion is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting ECF No. 44 Defendant DraftKings' Motion to Stay Discovery. It is further Ordered the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Discovery Planand Proposed Scheduling Order ECF No. 58 is denied without prejudice. If the pending Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 37 is denied, the parties must update and refile the proposed discovery plan within 14 days from the date of the order on the motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 09/27/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
