Fernandez v. Aranas et al
| Rene F. Fernandez |
| Romeo Aranas, Joyce Chang, Karen Gedney, Ted Hanf, Jim Holmes, Steven Miner, Nixon and Sean Su |
| 2:2016cv00812 |
| April 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| James C. Mahan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Extend Time to file a Response ; ORDER denying 48 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying 53 Motion to deny defendant's motions; ORDER granting 65 Motion to Strike Amended Complaint; ORDER granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying as moot 55 Motion for Relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Serve 12 , 20 and 27 and denied as to Exhibit C. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: 29 Order to P - JM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 30 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
