CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. bwin.party digital entertainment PLC et al
CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games LLC and Interactive Games Limited |
Bwin.Party (USA), Inc., Bwin.Party Digital Entertainment, PLC and Bwin.Party Entertainment (NJ), LLC |
2:2016cv00871 |
April 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Robert C. Jones |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER denying ECF Nos. 46 Motion to Reconsider and 47 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/04/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 62 ORDER granting the Motions to Consolidate (ECF No. 76 in 2:16-cv-801, ECF No. 47 in 2:16-cv-856, ECF No. 38 in 2:16-cv-857, ECF No. 62 in 2:16-cv-858, ECF No. 50 in 2:16-cv-859, ECF No. 41 in 2:16-cv-871), consolidating for pretrial purpose s cases 2:16-cv-856, 2:16-cv-857, 2:16-cv-858, 2:16-cv-859, and 2:16-cv-871 under 2:16-cv-801 -- all filings to be made in Lead Case only until further notice; directing Clerk to enter copy of this Order into dockets of each of the cases. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 42 ORDER denying ECF No. 31 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.