Belval v. Walgreen's et al
| Marie Lynn Belval |
| Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center, HealthCare Partners Medical Group, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Robert Musni, Sedgwick Insurance, Sunrise Medical Center, Von's and Walgreen's |
| 2:2016cv00893 |
| April 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 42 Magistrate Judge Foley's report and recommendation be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendant Siegel Suites be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the instant case be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 28 plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have until 1/5/18 to file a second amended complaint if she believes she can corr ect the noted deficiencies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 34 Motion for Relief is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 38 Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 40 Motion for Defendant's Name Change is denied. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims against Siegel Suites be dismissed with prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to demonstrate that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over her claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 12/7/2017 to correct document title. (ADR).
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 12 , 21 plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order be, and the same hereby are, DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/27/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have until February 21, 2017 to file an amend ed complaint if she believes she can correct the noted deficiencies. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the dismissal of this action.FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF Nos. 6 , 8 , 13 , and 20 ) are denied. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint she shall include all parties and claims against them at that time. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , and 22 Motions are Denied without prejudice as premature. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 09/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
