Shorter v. City of Las Vegas, et al
| Teaira Shorter |
| City of Las Vegas, City of Las Vegas Detention Center, City of North Las Vegas, Joe Halpin, V. Hijar, Ifeanyi Madu and Venezuela |
| 2:2016cv00971 |
| April 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER Granting 89 Stipulation to Extend Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/6/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER denying 81 Motion to Amend/Correct 80 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation to Amend Pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that 15 Motion to Extend Time for Service is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall effectuate service of the Summons and the Complaint upon Defendant Venezuela and Defendant Madu on or before September 27, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/29/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
