Compagnie Maritime Marfret v. Natural Waters, Inc., et al.
| Compagnie Maritime Marfret |
| Larry J. Lucas, Natural Waters, Inc. and Samuel J. Rowe |
| 2:2016cv01211 |
| May 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| James C. Mahan |
| Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Compagnie Maritime Marfret against Samuel J. Rowe. Re: 49 Order on Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 7/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
36
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Compagnie Maritime Marfret against Natural Waters, Inc. and Larry J. Lucas. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 6/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER that 21 Rowe's Motion to Set Aside 14 Clerk's Entry of Default is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 15 Marfret's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED as to Natural and Lucas, but DENIED as to Rowe. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 15 Application for Entry of Default Judgment. Responses due by 12/8/2016. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
