Ellis et al v. Zheng et al
Plaintiff: Christina Ellis and Jonathan Ellis
Defendant: SJ 5308 Investment Group and Jing Shu Zheng
Case Number: 2:2016cv01447
Filed: November 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Andrew P. Gordon
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER FOR BRIEFING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States to file a response brief by 9/24/2021 re 97 Motion for Hearing Before District Judge. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Christina Ellis, Jonathan Ellis against Jing Shu Zheng. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 8/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER Granting 68 Motion for Attorney Fees. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Christina Ellis and Jonathan Ellis and against defendant Jing Shu Zheng in the amount of $5,520 in attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER that the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment against defendant Jing Shu Zheng and in favor of the United States of America. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER that the clerk of court is to enter judgment against Zheng and in favor of the Ellises on Zheng's counterclaims. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER The Court ADMONISHES Ms. Zheng for her failure to comply. The Court further CAUTIONS Ms. Zheng that she is required to follow all orders moving forward. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Setting Evidentiary Hearing for 9/18/2018 at 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Jing Shu Zheng is ORDERED to appear in person. Counter Defendants may themselves file a response to this order and to the order to show cause more generally by September 14, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER to file, no later than September 10, 2018, either a motion for default judgment or dismissal paperwork. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 35 Motion to Extend Time; ORDER granting 29 Motion to Extend Time; Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/29/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDERED that 24 plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. A penalty is entered against Zheng and in favor of the United States in the amount of $121,000.00, and a damages award is entered against Zheng and in favor of the Uni ted States in the amount of $56,316.00, for a total amount of $177,316.00.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a proposed joint pre-trial order on Zheng's counterclaims and the claims against SJ 5318 within 30 days of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SEALED ORDER unsealing Complaint and to be served upon the defendant by the relator. The seal is lifted as to all other matters after the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/3/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Parties in Case - JM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellis et al v. Zheng et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Ellis
Represented By: Dawn R. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Ellis
Represented By: Dawn R. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SJ 5308 Investment Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jing Shu Zheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?