Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Summit Hills Homeowners Association et al
| Nationstar Mortgage LLC |
| Edward Kielty Trust and Summit Hills Homeowners Association |
| 2:2016cv01637 |
| July 12, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| George Foley |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER granting ECF No. 83 Stipulation of Dismissal of Claims Against Summit Hills Homeowners Association With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/27/2019. (Summit Hills Homeowners Association terminated.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER that Defendant Edward Kielty Trust's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 58 ) is granted; Nationstar's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54 ) is denied; Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of Edward Kielty Trust in accordance with this order and close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting ECF No. 78 Motion to Remove Attorneys from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/24/2019. (Attorneys Thera A Cooper and Vatana Lay terminated on behalf of Nationstar Mortgage LLC.) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting ECF No. 67 Stipulation to Extend (Second Request): The deadline for Nationstar to reply in support of its motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 54 ), oppose Kielty Trust's countermotion (ECF No. 58 ), and oppose Summit's motion (ECF No. 61 ) is extended to 2/15/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting ECF No. 64 Stipulation : Nationstar's reply to Summit's limited opposition, ECFNo. 56 , is extended to January 28, 2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting ECF No. 60 Motion to Substitute Counsel. Attorney Sean L. Anderson and T. Chase Pittsenbarger of the law firm Leach Kern Gruchow Anderson on behalf of Summit Hills Homeowners' Association in place and stead of attorneys Elizabeth B Lowell and James W Pengilly of the Robbins Law Firm (formerly Pengilly Law Firm). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting ECF No. 52 Stipulation to Extend: Dispositive Motions due by 1/7/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting ECF No. 47 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Joint Status Report Pursuant to Court's January 11, 2018 Order (ECF No. 44 ). (First Request). Joint Status Report due by 8/21/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER lifting temporary stay. Pending motions that were denied without prejudice when the stay was imposed may be refiled within 30 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER staying case pending the Ninth Circuit's issuance of the mandate in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
