Doe v. Clark County School District et al
| Jane Doe |
| Fausto Barraza-Balcazar and Clark County School District |
| 2:2016cv01696 |
| July 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 61 Stipulation of Dismissal. ORDERED that all claims against Clark County School District in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. Plaintiff must file a motion for default judgment or to dismiss the claims against remaining defaulted defendant Fausto Barraza-Balcazar within 20 days. Plaintiff's obligation to provide the court with proof of establishment of a blocked trust account containing the net settlement proceeds by November 15, 2018, as directed by Magistrate Judge Leen's October 16, 2018, order survives this dismissal and remains in effect. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER that 59 Plaintiff's Verified Petition to Establish the Reasonableness of a Proposed Settlement and Proposed Distribution of Settlement Proceeds is GRANTED as enumerated in this order. Plaintiff shall have until November 15, 2018, in which to provide proof of the establishment of a blocked trust account containing the net settlement proceeds as ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER that 57 Motion for the Compromise of a Minor's Claim is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's counsel shall have until September 26, 2018 to file a verified petition establishing the reasonableness of the proposed settlement and proposed distribution of settlement proceeds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 52 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Expert Witness Depositions; Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 48 Stipulation to Extend Time. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case proceeds to trial on Does claims for negligence/negligent supervision only. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to a magistrate judge for amandatory settlement conference. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation to Extend Time re 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Replies due by 6/23/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER re 15 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/30/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation to File Second Amended Complaint. Amended Complaint deadline: 9/9/2016. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
